...

Posted on: 10/21/2025

Why “In-House Legal” in Surrogacy Agencies Is a Red Flag for Intended Parents

Written by Encheng Cheng
• Ivy Team

Key Takeaways

  • ⚖️ In-house legal means the agency’s own lawyer drafts or reviews contracts for intended parents.

  • This setup creates a conflict of interest and may violate laws requiring independent representation.

  • California Family Code §7962 mandates that both intended parents and gestational carriers have independent legal counsel.

  • The ethical principle behind it—avoiding conflicts of interest—applies across all U.S. states and most developed legal systems.

  • Ivy Surrogacy does not—and will never—use in-house legal. We work exclusively with independent reproductive law attorneys.

  • Intended parents are always free to choose their own attorney, but selecting one familiar with surrogacy law is essential to avoid costly procedural errors.


What “In-House Legal” Means — and Why It’s Risky

Some surrogacy agencies promote their in-house legal departments as a way to “simplify” the process. At first glance, this might sound convenient—one agency handling everything under one roof.

But in reality, it raises a crucial question: who does the lawyer truly represent? If the attorney is employed and paid by the agency, their first loyalty is to their employer, not to you as the client. This inherent bias can have serious consequences when legal conflicts arise.


The Legal and Ethical Problem: Conflict of Interest

In a surrogacy arrangement, intended parents (IPs) and the gestational carrier (GC) each have distinct interests and rights that must be independently represented.

When a lawyer employed by the agency drafts or reviews your contract, several risks appear:

  • Divided loyalty: The attorney’s fiduciary duty is compromised between the employer and the client.

  • Biased drafting: Contract terms may favor agency policies or limit the agency’s liability.

  • Limited accountability: If a dispute occurs, it becomes harder to challenge a contract created under the agency’s direction.

Independent legal representation is not an optional formality—it is an ethical necessity designed to ensure fairness and transparency.


What the Law Says: California and Beyond

Under California Family Code §7962, each party in a gestational surrogacy arrangement must have independent legal counsel before signing any contract.

This requirement ensures that:

  • Intended parents have their own attorney;

  • The gestational carrier has hers;

  • Neither attorney can be employed by or affiliated with the surrogacy agency.

California’s statute is one of the clearest written surrogacy laws in the world, but its core principle—avoiding conflicts of interest—is universal.

Even in states without explicit surrogacy legislation, the Rules of Professional Conduct governing attorneys nationwide prohibit dual representation or any situation that compromises a lawyer’s independence.
In other words:

Whether your surrogacy journey takes place in California, Texas, Florida, or anywhere else, demanding independent legal counsel is always the best practice to protect your rights.


How Conflicts of Interest Commonly Show Up

Infographic comparing Independent Legal vs In-House Legal in surrogacy — showing key differences such as having own attorney, no conflicts of interest, and parent advocacy versus agency attorney and conflict of interest — landscape layout.

You don’t need a courtroom case to see the risks—here are the practical signs that independence may be compromised:

  • Unequal terms: The contract disproportionately favors the agency’s risk protection.

  • Limited disclosure: Insurance, birth orders, or key legal timelines aren’t clearly explained.

  • Little negotiation flexibility: You’re told the contract is “standard” and not open to revision.

  • One-direction communication: The lawyer appears to coordinate more with the agency than with you.

These red flags show why “convenience” should never outweigh your right to independent advice.


How Ivy Surrogacy Ensures Legal Independence

At Ivy Surrogacy, we believe integrity and transparency are non-negotiable.

  1. We do not—and will never—have in-house legal.
    We do not employ any attorney to draft or review client contracts.

  2. We refer intended parents to independent attorneys we know and trust.
    Over the years, we have built strong working relationships with experienced reproductive and family law attorneys who:

    • Communicate efficiently with IVF clinics and family courts;

    • Have extensive experience with international clients;

    • Offer multilingual legal services when needed.

  3. You are always free to choose your own lawyer.
    Our referrals are optional and purely for convenience.
    However, we strongly recommend choosing a lawyer who practices family law or assisted reproduction law, not an unrelated specialty.

We once had intended parents who chose an immigration lawyer to handle their surrogacy contract. Although the baby was delivered full-term, the attorney failed to process the Pre-Birth Order (PBO) on time—delaying legal parentage confirmation after delivery. This experience underscored why specialized, independent legal counsel is essential for a smooth, legally sound journey.


The Bottom Line

If an agency offers to “handle your legal work internally,” pause and ask:

Who is that lawyer really protecting?

Independent legal counsel isn’t just another step—it’s the foundation of ethical, compliant, and transparent surrogacy.

At Ivy Surrogacy, we’re committed to ensuring every intended parent is represented by independent legal professionals who safeguard their interests, every step of the way.

Learn more about how to start your surrogacy journey safely and transparently.
Schedule a free consultation today to discuss how our team protects intended parents at every stage.


FAQs

1. Why can’t a surrogacy agency’s in-house lawyer represent intended parents?

Because it creates a conflict of interest—the lawyer’s employer is the agency, making independent advice impossible.

2. What does California law require for surrogacy contracts?

California Family Code §7962 mandates that both intended parents and surrogates must have independent legal counsel before signing any agreement.

3. Are there similar rules in other states?

Yes. Even if another state lacks explicit surrogacy legislation, all states follow legal ethics rules prohibiting conflicts of interest in attorney representation.

4. How does Ivy Surrogacy ensure legal fairness?

We collaborate with independent attorneys experienced in reproductive law, international cases, and multilingual services—but clients are free to choose their own counsel.

5. What happens if I hire a lawyer from another field?

Using a non-specialized lawyer can cause serious delays or errors—like missing court deadlines for parentage orders (PBOs) or omitting key legal provisions.

Encheng Cheng, International Client Director at Ivy Surrogacy
International Client Director
Mandarin

Encheng Cheng brings over two decades of medical and healthcare experience to his role as International Client Director at Ivy Surrogacy. Trained in clinical medicine at Shandong University Medical School, he later practiced at the prestigious Peking Union Medical College Hospital, where he worked alongside leading surgeons and gained invaluable clinical expertise.

Before moving to the United States, Encheng helped shape China’s digital healthcare landscape. At Haodf.com, China’s largest and most respected online healthcare platform, he was an early founding team member. He built the industry’s first large-scale online medical triage system, leading a fifty-member team of medical professionals and matching nearly 8,000 new patient consultations daily with the right specialists. This innovation set the benchmark for online healthcare in China, and the platform now serves millions of patients nationwide.

Later, as co-founder and COO of White Angel, Encheng led a twenty-person team to create one of China’s largest medical education platforms, producing more than 8,000 original training videos in partnership with top hospitals.

After relocating to the U.S. with his family, Encheng combined his medical expertise with a passion for helping families grow. Over the past several years, he has advised thousands of intended parents from China on IVF, egg donation, and surrogacy, guiding them with clarity and compassion. Many families have realized their dream of parenthood thanks to his support.

In addition to consultations, Encheng has authored hundreds of educational articles on fertility and reproductive care. His science-based writings enjoy wide readership among Chinese intended parents, and many families first reached Ivy Surrogacy after encountering his work. Known affectionately as “Dr. Cheng,” he is regarded as a trusted source of knowledge in the community.

Encheng also contributes to academic publishing. He serves on the editorial board of China Digital Medicine and reviews for Digital Medicine and the Journal of Medical Internet Research, reflecting his dedication to advancing global knowledge in digital health and reproductive medicine.

Today, as International Client Director at Ivy Surrogacy, Encheng continues to bridge cultures, share knowledge, and provide personalized support to intended parents worldwide.

Follow Dr. Cheng on X (Twitter) and Facebook for updates and insights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *